Waiting for Nurses

By

Posted to Nurse Safety, Nursing, Nursing News

VILevi - Fotolia.com

A new poll has found that 34% of patients who were hospitalized for at least one night in the past year said that “nurses weren’t available when needed or didn’t respond quickly to requests for help.”

The poll was conducted by NPR, the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Harvard School of Public Health.

NPR was surprised at the findings and decided to find out more, so they put a request on Facebook for nurses to respond to the poll and provide their own stories. They received hundreds of responses, with stories about nurses feeling overworked, not getting enough breaks or even no breaks at all, and even barely enough time to go to the bathroom.

Most of the nurses who responded did not want to be interviewed for a broadcast, because they were worried about their employers’ reaction. Many were willing to be interviewed anonymously, though.

They conveyed a picture of being understaffed and overworked — even though the nursing shortage is considered to be over in most places, each individual nurse still has a whole lot on his or her plate.

“We’re always afraid that something will happen to our patients during the time we’re off the floor,” one nurse says, “and I personally don’t feel comfortable leaving them unless I know that a co-worker is actually looking after them during the time that I’m off the floor.”

This nurse says she rarely stops. Not for 12 hours. She’s an emergency room nurse in a busy urban hospital. The ideal, she says, would be one nurse for every three patients in her ER. But she typically cares for five patients or more — often eight, if she’s covering for a colleague taking a lunch break. She says there are times when she can’t leave patients’ bedsides.

“Maybe I was injecting medication that you have to push slowly over five to 10 minutes so it doesn’t harm them,” she says, “and I can see the call bell going off in the hallway, and there’s no way I could respond to that.”

The only option is to literally yell down the hallway and hope another nurse hears her and responds to the patient call bell. There have been times when she has driven home at the end of her 12-hour shift, white-knuckling the steering wheel and wondering whether she “missed something.”

Another nurse likens her job to “spinning plates,” just “praying,” she says, that one doesn’t fall. “And these are human beings,” she says, “not products on conveyor belts.”

Stories like this suggest there’s a shortage of nurses. But Linda Aiken, a researcher and professor of nursing at the University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, says that’s not the case. There was a shortage about a decade ago, she says. Today, that has changed. The number of RNs graduating has increased dramatically over the past decade, but many can’t find jobs.

“There’s not an actual nursing shortage,” Aiken says. “There’s a shortage of nursing care in hospitals and other health care facilities.”

Nancy Foster, a vice president with the American Hospital Association, says hospitals are facing big financial challenges.

“In part, it’s because our patients are sicker — coming to us with more intense diseases and disorders than they did 25 years ago,” she says. “In part, it’s because there’s so many more medications and devices and other interventions at our fingertips; we can help many more patients and restore them to health.”

That is terrific, of course, but it’s not cheap. Any reduction in nurse staffing at a time of increasing patient demand jeopardizes patient care, Aiken says.

“Nurses are the surveillance system in hospitals for early detection and intervention [to save patients’ lives],” she says.

According to one nurse, little clues from patients are critical.

“I mean, you might walk into a room, and they are breathing and answering your questions,” the nurse says, “but if you look at their neck and the jugular vein is slightly distended … taking the time to pick up on the small details like that are the early warning signs that somebody is getting sicker fast.”